{"id":732,"date":"2004-03-03T12:03:06","date_gmt":"2004-03-03T20:03:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lee.org\/blog\/archives\/2004\/03\/03\/732\/"},"modified":"2007-03-06T03:33:45","modified_gmt":"2007-03-06T11:33:45","slug":"more-about-cloudmark-spamnet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lee.org\/blog\/2004\/03\/03\/more-about-cloudmark-spamnet\/","title":{"rendered":"More About Cloudmark Spamnet"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.cloudmark.com\/\">Spamnet<\/a> isn&#8217;t perfect. It correctly blocks about 40 spams a day of mine. But it also incorrectly blocks about 1 non-spam per day. That&#8217;s a big pain because it means I have to sift through my spam list every week or so looking for mistakes.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m going to try using dual filtering. I&#8217;ll set my ISP&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.spamassassin.org\/\">SpamAssassin<\/a> to a conservative setting and keep Spamnet. The idea being that SpamAssassin won&#8217;t have any accidental hits. That will reduce the number of emails I&#8217;ll have to sift through.<\/p>\n<p>As a side note, I just found out that Spamnet uses the same spam identification network that SpamAssassin does. SpamAssassin uses <a href=\"http:\/\/razor.sourceforge.net\/docs\/faq.php\">Vipul&#8217;s Razor<\/a> for fingerprinting spams.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Spamnet isn&#8217;t perfect. It correctly blocks about 40 spams a day of mine. But it also incorrectly blocks about 1 non-spam per day. That&#8217;s a big pain because it means I have to sift through my spam list every week or so looking for mistakes. I&#8217;m going to try using dual filtering. I&#8217;ll set my [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-732","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lee.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/732","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lee.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lee.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lee.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lee.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=732"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.lee.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/732\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lee.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=732"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lee.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=732"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lee.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=732"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}